Re: Decompression of Inferior Rectal Nerve Branch?
Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2011 4:57 am
Hi Gregg,
Dr. Beco in Belgium does the Trans-perenial approach but he does sever the Sacospinous ligament now.Ask Dr. Marvel if he can access the whole of the Alcock's Canal and whether he is severing the Sacrospinous ligament.
Your best bet is Dr. Bautrant' TIR when it comes to the Alcock''s Canal because he can remove any scar tissue there,and Especially in men because that's where he makes the incision.Dr. Mark Conway does the TIR approach but his results haven't been so promising.It is better to go Dr. Bautrant himself to have the TIR approach done if you are interested.
As far as the TG approach concerned, it is of three types now.
1)The traditional TG approach used by Professor Robert of Nantes and the Houston team in which both the Sacrotuberous and Sacrospinous ligament is severed.
2)Modified Approach by Dr. Hibner in which the Sacrotuberous ligament is 30-50% severed at the vertical axis but then repaired with grafted Cadavers.The Sacrospinous ligament is severed.
3)Modified approach by Dr. Antalok in which the Sacrotuberous ligament is vertically cut in the middle and then sewed back but the Sacrospinous ligament is severed.Karyn can help you out more regarding this since she is going to have this modified version with Dr. Conway.
The surgical results are poor in all three approaches mentioned
above and that what concerns the patient the most.
Hopefully,this is helpful.
Kind Regards,
Ali
1
Dr. Beco in Belgium does the Trans-perenial approach but he does sever the Sacospinous ligament now.Ask Dr. Marvel if he can access the whole of the Alcock's Canal and whether he is severing the Sacrospinous ligament.
Your best bet is Dr. Bautrant' TIR when it comes to the Alcock''s Canal because he can remove any scar tissue there,and Especially in men because that's where he makes the incision.Dr. Mark Conway does the TIR approach but his results haven't been so promising.It is better to go Dr. Bautrant himself to have the TIR approach done if you are interested.
As far as the TG approach concerned, it is of three types now.
1)The traditional TG approach used by Professor Robert of Nantes and the Houston team in which both the Sacrotuberous and Sacrospinous ligament is severed.
2)Modified Approach by Dr. Hibner in which the Sacrotuberous ligament is 30-50% severed at the vertical axis but then repaired with grafted Cadavers.The Sacrospinous ligament is severed.
3)Modified approach by Dr. Antalok in which the Sacrotuberous ligament is vertically cut in the middle and then sewed back but the Sacrospinous ligament is severed.Karyn can help you out more regarding this since she is going to have this modified version with Dr. Conway.
The surgical results are poor in all three approaches mentioned
above and that what concerns the patient the most.
Hopefully,this is helpful.
Kind Regards,
Ali
1