LottaNerve wrote:That's a shame that Dave was cut out of the forum. When I read back over the posts, it sounded more like he was responding to questions posed to him, not advertising. It was only when he was asked several times and specifically how to go about doing what he did, that he revealed he had started teaching it.
I thought there was a process for situations like this, with the first step being a warning and either deleting the comment or allowing the person to edit it?
Respectfully,
Sharon aka LottaNerve
I don't know what Dave's intentions or ethics are but he agreed not to advertise before he posted. Also in the terms of use members agree not to advertise. So is he allowed to use the forum to get his foot in the door and then start advertising via private message? If people advertise via private message you can't exactly ask someone to edit a private message after the fact.ezer wrote:I don't see why DaveM's practice could not be listed as a resource on the home page under providers. You could also list mindbody experts like Abigail Steidley or lorraine Faehndrich. We have now 3 or 4 patients including myself that have recovered using alternative methods for healing (I personally know more people than that but they are not on this forum). I think it deserves some place next to surgery with its ahem... not so great outcome.
We show utter deference to and list some PNE doctors whose track record of success are nil as far as I can tell on this forum.
You don't want to be seen as the "Pudendal surgery site" which I am afraid is how pudendalhope is perceived because most of the advisers are pudendal surgeons.
Pudendal nerve entrapment is not exactly a diagnosis devoid of controversy within the allopathic medical community itself. It is as controversial if not more than some alternative theories:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19238769
Pudendal neuralgia. Fact or fiction?
We are a non-profit organization and we have certain agreements with the government on what we can and can't do to maintain our tax exempt status. In our agreement with the government to have tax exempt status, we are allowed to list healthcare providers as long as we don't endorse them, but our listings are limited to providers who are licensed which means there is some government oversight in assuring that they have a certain amount of training to have gained and maintained that license. When providers are licensed, we can check their licenses for complaints, etc.
If there are mindbody therapists who are licensed psychologists or pscychiatrists I think that would fall within our guidelines of licensed providers. Doctors of oriental medicine or chiropractors would also fall into the category of being licensed. But I think we are walking on shaky ground if we allow listings of unlicensed providers.
So for all of you who are criticizing the actions of the moderators/directors, I have several questions for you.
1. Should we just let anyone and everyone come on the forum and advertise whatever they want to and send PM's advertising to all of the forum members?
2. Do you all want to be receiving PM's with advertisements from all kinds of people who want to sell things?
3. If we allow one, we have to allow all. Or else we have to sort through who we do and don't allow and we could be opening up a huge can of worms if we do that. For those who want us to allow non-licensed providers, who of you would like to help us sort out who is legitimate or not, what we allow and what we don't?
4. How many hours a week would you like to spend helping to figure out who is legitimate and who isn't?
5. Would you like to help out and become a director or moderator, including sorting through all of the emails in the admin box from people who want to advertise on the forum and sorting through all of the posts that are made? We could use more help around here.
6. If we change the advertising policy and our bylaws and our agreement with the IRS, who wants to help be a director and come up with new bylaws, new advertising policy, new terms of agreement, and new agreement with the IRS? How much time would you like to spend doing that?
7. How much would you like to pay an attorney to change all of that?
Ezer, you have suggested adding some new practitioners/providers to the website. As a director you were invited to do so. You are still welcome to do so. When would you like to start? I would love to see more advisers who aren't physicians but someone has to take the time to invite them and post them on the website. I have a full time job and unfortunately, I don't have time to work on it right now. Lottanerve, if you want changes, you are also welcome to come back as a director and help out.
We have never prevented people from coming on the forum to say they were helped by this or that therapy -- alternative or otherwise, unlicensed or licensed. We have never prevented anyone from saying surgery, injections, PT, or whatever, didn't help them or made them worse. We have never prevented people from respectfully posting bad experiences with providers. We aren't trying to hide or promote anything here.
Violet